> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > > > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:25:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote: > > > > > > ... I would prefer that > JCL be VB. > > >There would be no sequence numbering at all. > > > > > Bravo! > > Bye, bye IEBUPDTE? > > -jc-
Yes. Why would anybody need IEBUPDTE for JCL? Or much of anything else, for that matter. Yes, I know about source code maintenance via SMP/E. I wish that IEBUPDTE had a "relative line number" capability. Personally, I prefer the UNIX patch command. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
