In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/04/2008
at 06:03 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Abolish the "SYSIN DD * GENERATED STATEMENT". I never
>use the construct deliberately.
Maybe you don't, but that doesn't justify breaking it for those that do.
How about a parameter on the JOB statements or JES equivalents that turns
on incompatible behaviors?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/05/2008
at 05:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>And which "program" among these is it that's
>folding my data from DSN(*)?
None of them; it's the access method.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
