I wonder if there is some repackaging along the way. My model assumes
that a single packet traverses the network unchanged in any way.

A fixed delay at the appliance works, but I don't understand how a
packet that has to be transmitted twice would take the same amount of
time as one transmitted only once. Unless the appliance were to begin
transmitting the packet before it had completely arrived. 

The network speeds are not that relevant in this specific sub context.


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Slow FTP transfer from z/OS to Unix

Hal Merritt wrote:
> How do you define 'performance'? 
>   

We test our network using ftp to transfer large zipped files. Our 
definition of 'performance' is KBytes/sec.

-- 
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to