On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:19:46 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: >>I haven't seen any evidence in this thread that leads me to believe they have put any new code below the line. > >>>> Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/10/2008 12:38 PM >>> >>>I disagree to the extent that IBM should not be putting new code below the line. > >The very first post was on that very topic. >And, so is the subject heading.
The first post made that allegation, but provided no evidence to back it up. As several have pointed out, there are many other reasons for the symptom that the OP described. Until the OP performs the analysis to determine *why* there is less available private below the line, we will not know for sure. I don't think anyone mentioned yet to check the location of SWA and the UCBs. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
