> IBM appears to be expanding use of storage below the 16M line, > rather than converting their own code to 31-bit addressability. Here is > the reply I received when I ETR asked CICS why I could no longer get a > certain DSALIM value in TS22 after going to zos 1.08. > "There is Common Storage shared by all address spaces, and not > considered > part of the private storage available for address space (task) use.
Since everybody here is insisting on evidence, do you have any regarding what specifically changed going from <whatever> to z/OS 1.8? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
