On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:13:27 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been unable so far to convince the powers that be that operlog is much >better as it definitely shows more (everythings after a $pjes2 during shutdown), >so no one really cares about operlog. > That is a minor benefit. The big benefit is having all the logs for the sysplex combined in one place when trying to diagnose a problem. There is still a 9 system sysplex here that doesn't use it because they couldn't afford the extra CF activity in their DB2 data sharing environment. But that decision goes back to 9672 CFs. I don't think it would have been an issue with the z900-100 CFs and it certainly wouldn't be an issue today with z9 CFs. Just haven't gotten around to it yet. Anyway... trying to look back at problems in that sysplex can be a real PITA to say the least if you don't know what system to start looking on. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
