On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:50:41 -0500 "W. Kevin Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>IBM would like to know if anyone has created dependencies on the ordering of :>subsystem initialization routines or depends on the subsystem initialization :>process being synchronous. :>We are specifically interested in the subsystem initialization routines that are :>run as part of defining the subsystem to the subsystem interface (SSI). :>(These are NOT the subsystem initialization routines that run when the :>subsystem is activated.) The subsystem initialization routines we're interested :>in are run as each IEFSSNxx statement is processed. Note that not all :>subsystem have subsystem initialization routines that run during IEFSSNxx :>processing. I have written such code, since there is no other "hook" area to get control early enough in the IPL process. I know that placing the SSI routine first guarantees that other SSI stuff will wait until it is done. I have inserted other system hooks, issued an ASCRE's and waited for the initialization exit to complete before allowing the next SSI routine to get control. Now, if IBM wishes to add some new - PARMLIB specified - early IPL exit I would go along with it. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
