On 28 Aug 2008 11:38:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKown) wrote:

They are now not
only demanding that stupid disclaimer, but demanding that all email be posted in HTML so that the disclaimer is sent with the corporate approved
font and color scheme.

It's a losing battle, but you might try some combination of:

1. Find sites which explain that the disclaimers aren't legally binding, anyway. Explain that the company may get bad publicity if its disclaimer ends up on (e.g.) <http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/list.html>.

2. Show them a screen print of their HTML disclaimer from a non-HTML email client. Suggest that any legally binding effect of the disclaimer may be nullified if it is thus hidden within "unreadable" HTML text.

3 Search for various sites which explain why HTML email is bad, in general. Show them to your boss. (E.g. <http://www.expita.com/nomime.html>.)

4. Research past work-related questions you've asked on Listservs (this and others), and the amount of time it took to get back good answers. Explain that this source of answers is not available if you're required to post in HTML.


--
I cannot receive mail at the address this was sent from.
To reply directly, send to ar23hur "at" intergate "dot" com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to