We all know that the PHBs are telling everyone that TSO and ISPF are dead and that we should all be using some sort of GUI interface - however what I have found is that the people using the software that I write get WAY more excited at the ISPF interface functions than the web/java stuff.
Then again - maybe my customers have a higher beard+sandles+pipe co-efficient than most...:-) Rob Scott Rocket Software, Inc 275 Grove Street Newton, MA 02466 617-614-2305 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: 04 September 2008 16:55 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CHROME and WEB apps on Mainframe? Personally I think we should have put a lot more effort into TSO and ISPF. That's just a gut feeling... I can't give specifics. It's just knowing how good CMS is that makes me feel that way about TSO. (And given that a lot of my TSO usage is actually inside Batch I could see my Batch programming benefiting also.) Oh I CAN think of ONE specific: It would be very nice to see Object REXX run under TSO. Martin Martin Packer Performance Consultant IBM United Kingdom Ltd +44-20-8832-5167 +44-7802-245-584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
