Yes.
The I/O that needs an Alias will get one with HyperPAV. With Dynamic it may
have to wait (depending on I/O concurrency to that UCB and current number of
PAVs assigned).
Additional benifts.
A reduction in the number of Alias addresses that you need to define per LCU
(Allows for more Base addresses!)
No WLM intra-Sysplex communication needed (each LPAR needs to know the
current assignment status).
Alias assignment is based on I/O priority
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "gsg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Hyper PAVs vs. Dynamic PAVs
Is there significant improvement from Dynamic to Hyper?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
