I've never used CSVLLAxx. What is that used for? I know whenever I do an LLA refresh, it takes only seconds. I doubt if that would have any significant effect on performance.
Eric ---- Hylton Tom P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As DB2 guy, I used to religously use the CSVLLAxx member to avoid > impacting others. > > However, my main zos guru recommended to me a while back (maybe the last > 2 ZOS releases?) that the benefits were so minimal now that it wasn't > worth the effort to code the CSVLLA route any longer, and to just go > ahead and do a total refresh each time. > > Anyone concur? > > > We're 1.9, and YMMV of course, > tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Update datasets defined in lnklst > > Rather than a total refresh of LLA, often F LLA,UPDATE=xx for the > specific library has less impact on performance (construction of the > CSVLLAxx member is an exercise left to the implementer). > -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer Washington University St Louis, Missouri 314-935-3418 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
