Ted, Don't bust my gonads Ted! Your original response was a timeline, not an answer. Why do you find it so hard to accept another opinion on a topic?
I agree with the IBM presenter - that is the fact of the matter. I think HyperPAV is the best, most dynamic of the three methods that should be used when placing CRITICAL data on 3390-27. I don't find anything in your response changes that. The customer does not know if he NEEDS HyperPAV or not. If they are not in a position to answer that for themselves then there is the reason to NEED HyperPAV. HyperPAV mitigates the issue of ALIAS over/under allocation with Static and Dynamic, where under allocation is the greatest risk to critical workloads. I stressed that if you are folding volumes at a 9:1 ratio in an unplanned manner than you should use one of the three PAV methods, and HyperPAV will always be my first recommendation. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Performance Question - Dynamic PAV > > >Thx Ted. How does that information change my answer? > > You said some sort ogf PAV. > The OP was asking about *HYPER* PAV. > You did not answer his question. > - > Too busy driving to stop for gas! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
