On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:33:38 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: > >>Your original response was a timeline, not an answer. > >My resonse was intended to state that hyper PAVs were not needed. Since it wasn't a problem when -27's first came out, why is it a problem now?
That's not a logical response. HyperPAV was in fact invented to solve a problem, as Ron noted in the previous post. > >>I agree with the IBM presenter - that is the fact of the matter. > >Fine. You've now stated that. >Your original response didn't state that. Yes it did, Ted. And you quoted it in your first reply to Ron. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
