This exchange reminds me of some of the exchanges we used to have in the past between people I won't mention (Partly because I forgot their names). Some of the exchanges got heated. I know when I get comments I don't like, instead of firing off a nasty reply (Ted - this wasn't nasty - I'm not picking on you - atl least not yet), I'll just leave the post sit in my inbox for several hours. Then I'll go back and reply -hopefully with tact, or just decide to ignore the post.
Ted, sometimes I think your posts are a little too picky. Unfortuneatly, Ron always responds to your posts as in this thread. I've probably said too much already. Eric ---- Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Don't bust my gonads Ted! > > I'm not busting anything. > You didn't answer the question. > > >Your original response was a timeline, not an answer. > > My resonse was intended to state that hyper PAVs were not needed. Since it > wasn't a problem when -27's first came out, why is it a problem now? > > >Why do you find it so hard to accept another opinion on a topic? > > I accepted your opinion. You just didn't answer the question. You stated some > sort of PAV was required. This, I agreed with. > > >I agree with the IBM presenter - that is the fact of the matter. > > Fine. You've now stated that. > Your original response didn't state that. > I never disputed PAV's were required. > Just hyper PAVs. > > >I think HyperPAV is the best, most dynamic of the three methods that should > >be used when placing CRITICAL data on 3390-27. I don't find anything in your > >response changes that. > > Maybe. I wasn't trying to change your mind. > But, your original post did not state that you agreed with the IBM'r. > All it said was that any sort of PAV was required. > It DID NOT say that you agreed that hyper PAV's were required. > > That's all I was trying to say. > If you took offence, sorry. > > PS: I don't necessarily agree with the blanket statement that hyper PAV's are > required in this situation. > That was all I was trying to say, since they weren't required before. > They have only seemed to be a requirement since they came out. > -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer Washington University St Louis, Missouri 314-935-3418 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
