I don't think that anyone is defending bad programming practices, but
not all of us have the luxury of knowing what every program running on
our production systems is doing. Some were written long ago, some by
vendors, and some by just bad programmers. As a systems person I have to
make sure that programs that ran yesterday can run today without any
changes to them. Business is business and changes cost $$$$, so even if
the code was poorly written, if it is running now it better run
tomorrow. 


Jon L. Veilleux 
[email protected] 
(860) 636-2683 


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interesting APAR OA27291 an undocumented change to GETMAIN
Behavior in z/OS 1.10

>Just as a side note, I remember learning long ago to always initialize 
>static areas

Again, basic.
Again, I agree.

And, I can't understand the defensive stants, of those who don't/won't
believe that basic programming is wrong!

Forgetting to init is inexcusable!

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail immediately.
Thank you. Aetna   

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to