Ron,

Can't disagree with a thing you said.  Not sure where I've argued to the
other side of any of this.  

Thanks!

Scott T. Harder
Tech Support & Product Development
ASPG, Inc.
Ph:       239-649-1548 / Ext. 203
Fax:      239-649-6391
General Support Email:  [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Ron Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Crypto-DASD?

Scott,

Has your Storage Vendor ever replaced a failed or failing drive? Do you
know where that drive is now?

I know of several customer that purchase and stored their failed drives
because they cannot be erased using commercial software once they stop
working. I also know of one customer that has an annual "bash and burn"
session. 

A normal DASD init does not securely overwrite data on the disk drive.
It is no longer easy to read, but neither is it completely masked.
Writing over a track on disk is like driving over someone else's tire
tracks - you never completely cover up the first set of tracks unless
you drive over them a few times. 

Secure Erasure is built into the latest HDS controllers, or you can use
software like the FDR/ERASE. However, that doesn't protect data on
replaced drives, hence the requests by customers for vendors to look at
encryption of data at rest.

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of
> Eric Bielefeld
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Crypto-DASD?
> 
> Scott,
> 
> I still can't see why if you have a box in your datacenter, that will
never
> leave your datacenter until after its useful life is over, should be
> encrypted.  How are you going to access that data accept by the z/OS
operating
> system?  That's why we have security systems.  When the box is done,
and you
> sell it or scrap it, you can always initialize all the disks.
> 
> I asked my boss at P&H Mining if he wanted me to init all the disks,
or if he
> just wanted to let Hitachi do the initialize they do whenever a box is
sold,
> and he said just let Hitachi do it.  There was sensitive data in many
files,
> but I highly doubt if anyone could have recovered any of it after it
was
> initialized by Hitachi.  This was when P&H shut down z/OS for good.
> 
> I can see the value of encrypting data on PC hard drives, after all of
the
> problems people have had with stolen PCs with sensitive data on them,
but
> mainframe dasd?  I just can't see it, or any regulations requiring it.
> 
> Eric
> 
> --
> Eric Bielefeld
> Systems Programmer
> Washington University
> St Louis, Missouri
> 314-935-3418
> 
> ---- "Scott T. Harder" <[email protected]> wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to