Martin Thanks for staying with this.
> If by "CS IP PROFILE" you mean the TCPIP parameteres pointed to by the PROFILE DD statement in our TCPIP proc ... Indeed I do. They are the statements described in Chapter 2, "TCP/IP profile (PROFILE.TCPIP) and configuration statements" in the z/OS Configuration Server (CS) IP Configuration Reference manual. You would appear to qualify for this test since you don't have DYNAMICXCF defined as a parameter of your IPCONFIG statement. Now take a look at the messages in the log of the CS IP address space, possibly under the name TCPIP, and see whether in the first 20 or so messages there is one which states EZZ0331I NO HOME ADDRESS ASSIGNED TO LINK IUTSAMEH just as Stuart Willis reported in his original post. However, also looking in the PROFILE data set, perhaps you can say whether or not you have coded a pair of DEVICE and LINK statements of the form DEVICE IUTSAMEH MPCPTP LINK linkname MPCPTP IUTSAMEH If the answer is that you have defined such a pair of statements and you have also coded an entry in the HOME list assigning an IP address to linkname, then you don't qualify for this test! If you have not defined such a pair of statements and you have no entry in the HOME list with the link name EZASAMEMVS, then you do qualify for this test. I'm sorry to be so specific but I'm trying to cover all the bases. Thanks very much. Chris Mason On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0600, Martin Kline <[email protected]> wrote: >>Go and have a look in your CS IP PROFILE data set for DYNAMICXCF. > >If by "CS IP PROFILE" you mean the TCPIP parameteres pointed to by the >PROFILE DD statement in our TCPIP proc, DYNAMICXCF is not coded there >either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
