Kees,

DSS DUMP read tracks and recoveres the VTOC as a file, I believe.

Itschak

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
>
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:43:20 +0300, G+D+J+ B+N%  #B+J+
> <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >We are in the process of copying datasets from tape to disk. The
> users
> > > would like to keep the same creation dates.
> > > >
> > > How is changing the date likely to influence the backup
> > > process?  If a backed up version with the same DSNAME
> > > and a more recent timestamp exists, might the backup be
> > > skipped?
> > >
> > > Likewise, I noticed (long ago; it may now be different)
> > > that when I restored a data set from a backup copy,
> > > it was given the timestamp of the time of the restore.
> > > This would seem to cause HSM to back up the data set
> > > needlessly at the next cycle.
> > >
> > > I suppose there are different timestamps in many places;
> > > it all depends on which one the backup utility honors.
> > >
> > > -- gil
>
> > >"Itschak Mugzach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > The kind of backup you refer to is based on the change bit (Which is
> reset
> > on restore). DMS Vtoc utility is a dataset by dataset update utility.
> a
> > physical backup &restore would solve the need to "zap" the vto and
> would
> > keep the original creation dates.
> >
> > Itschak
> >
>
> No, remember the OP is copying datasets from tape to disk. After the
> copy, the dataset has today as creation date. A physical backup and
> restore does not change this. He likes to change the creation date back
> to the original creation date of the dataset on tape.
>
> Kees.
> **********************************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
> of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
> and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
> incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
> responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
> registered number 33014286
> **********************************************************************
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to