-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: What (More) Open Source Software for z/OS?

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:55:15 -0500, Ron Wells <[email protected]>
wrote:

>MVS use to be open..... It would not have gotten very far without the
aid
>of others back in the 60's/70's early 80's--- Before Microsoft started
>it's lock down..
>
>and yes
>
>would be a big benefit having it open again ...
>

Possibly. But, from what little I know, most of the new stuff is written
in
PL/S or whatever. It doesn't do much good to have source when you don't
have
a compiler!

Part of the "lock down" occurred when IBM transitioned from a "pure"
hardware company (where software was only used to help sell hardware) to
a
hardware + software company where software in itself became a source of
income. And the OEM CPU people may have been a part of it too since they
used IBM software (like OS/MVT) without the need for a license (due to
IBM
overlooking copyrighting the OS).

Another part of OCO is to keep information away from users so that they
don't use non-GUPI interfaces in such a way as to force IBM to "freeze"
that
interface due to its popularity. 
<SNIP>

You don't think that OCO was a reaction to some company located on/in an
Island country that took MVS, made modifications (and kept the same
errors and misspelling in error messages and the like), and then put it
out as their own SCP, would you?

Regards,
Steve Thompson

-- Opinions expressed by this poster may not reflect those of poster's
employer. --

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to