I'm not sure why this turned into another OCO debate, but attempting to 
return to Tim's original post:

I think we - as a community - do two things rather poorly:

1) Tell people how z/OS and its subsystems can participate really well in 
modern application styles.

2) Make 1) even truer than it is. I won't single out examples.

Maybe these are BOTH IBM's responsibility. Maybe not.

There is a 3), of course:

3) We - as PEOPLE - are less good than some others about portraying 
mainframe folks as a vibrant COMMUNITY. There are some notable exceptions, 
of course. For example, many of us express ourselves in 140 characters or 
fewer on a regular basis. :-)

When I present on this stuff inside IBM I normally add a few swear words. 
Especially around Point 3. I'll spare you those here. :-) To me it's quite 
frustrating.

Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
+44-7802-245-584

email: [email protected]

Twitter ID: MartinPacker

"They're figuring out that collaboration isn't a productivity hit, it 
makes them smarter." Sam Palmisano on BlogCentral, 26 November 2008





Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to