On Thu, 14 May 2009 11:05:28 -0400 Pinnacle <[email protected]> wrote:
:>----- Original Message ----- :>From: "Binyamin Dissen" <[email protected]> :>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main :>Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:40 AM :>Subject: Re: TSO/E Exits :>> On Thu, 14 May 2009 06:27:51 -0400 John Eells <[email protected]> wrote: :>> :>We want to prioritize some requirements, and your input would be very :>> :>helpful. I count more than 80 TSO/E exits, if you count the variations :>> :>like IKJEFLD/IKJEFLD1. (No worries, we don't plan to get rid of any!) :>> Be suspicious. Be very suspicious. :>No need to be suspicious. John is one of the good guys. He probably can't :>say much more than he did without violating IBM policy. Like Bob Shannon, I :>take what John Eells says at face value. He has done a lot for all of us, :>so I just sent him my info. You're off base on this one. Silly me. I can't think of a reason why IBM would survey this except to remove them (except for IKJEFLD which is no longer needed IMHO). I could understand questions on better exits, additional parameters, etc. But I did not mean anything personal. As a side point, I wonder as to the percentage of IBM shops that are on this list. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
