Indeed, and that may be exactly what happened: a change to the workload eliminated or reduced volume contention such that PAV redistribution is no longer needed.
AFAIK, WLM will move a PAV only when it believes that doing so will help some workload that is not meeting its goals. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Dynamic PAV assigment has stopped >More important is your IOSQ time increasing ? >Are the number of PAV adresses >insufficient ? The OP said he was fine, for now. But, I/O patterns do change, over the day, and over time. I still think the IODF and the WLM policy should be checked to see if it's enabled in both. It may be; it is a good idea to eliminate them as issues. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
