Yea, we checked the IODF and the WLM policy. No changes there. Last IODF change was earlier in April and everything is still set for PAV in there and in the WLM policy.
I liked the idea of reactivating the policy, but I checked and we have activated new policies with minor changes a couple times in the past few weeks (after the problem appeared). Thanks, Dave On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:43:50 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> wrote: >>Ah, but you did: > >>>"But, I/O patterns do change, over the day, and over time." > > >>And I agree with that as well the rest of your excellent advise. > >I guess I wasn't clear. >I find it difficult to believe that not a single PAV was re-assigned in a >month. >That was the purpose of my 'pattern' statement. > >That's why I said eliminate the possibility of the WLM policy or the IODF changing with regard to dynamic PAV. > >- >Too busy driving to stop for gas! > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
