Gil, No, those are user jobs. And no amount of prodding on my part will get an apps owner to change anything that returns rc=0.
Dave O'Brien NIH Contractor ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 11:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IEFBR14 (was: EXEC Above the Bar) On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:24:19 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote: >I for one look forward to jobs which now take hours taking just a few minutes >once we get to 1.11. > Hours? I'm surprised that while you were waiting hours for one of those jobs to complete you didn't take the opportunity to recode it to use HDELETE directly, or IKJEFT01 DELETE, which would have likewise reduced the time to minutes. Does Batch Allocation perform the HSM recalls for a step concurrently or serially? It's irritating when in ISPF DSLIST I select an action on several data sets, failing to notice that they're migrated, and wait in sequence for each to recall. I wish it would recall all concurrently, in background. Even more annoying, once it displays one, "=X" on the command line doesn't take me back to TSO READY prompt; it just goes on to recall the next data set. I split the screen and cancelled myself from SDSF. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
