This actually requires reading up on what the parms in the SFM policy do :-( I know why we treat all our systems the same! A quick look makes me guess that they intended to specify different weights to the lpars to keep the production system alive and kill the test system, if necessary. That is kinda confirmed by the PROMPT for the production system.
To be honest, while I (intellectually) understand the different weights, in reality the cases I have seen did not leave any choice but to remove a system that was 'dead' and was specified in either the ixc402D or IXC102A, so one might as well treat them all alike! EXSPAT: We don't have any such member in our parmlib concat, either. Meaning that we take all the IBM defaults. Then you apparently also take the IBM default, which I would consider good. As for the 'Suessigkeiten' - I am a fan of (virtual) gummibears! :-) (Just ask my colleagues!) :-) Best regards, Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
