On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:43:23 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote: > >A former employer of mine had user loadlibs in LLA (and I believe >lnklst). They were carried in a separate PROGxx member. >Every (in our case) 15 min, an F LLA,UPDATE=xx was issued by automation. >Not sure what they did when the applications loadlibs needed to be >compressed. > Is PDSE your friend here?:
o Is LNKLST PDSE-friendly? o Is LLA PDSE-friendly? o Does the OS hold LNKLST data sets open, thwarting reclaim of PDSE unused space? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
