Gord, Not sure what you saying, all COBOL is LE now...Assembler you can choose, C , I am not knowledgable in enough to say..
Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Gord Tomlin <[email protected]> wrote: > One could argue that creating LE enabled programs would not be very > "standard". You'd be challenged to find any UNIX implementation that could > run LE enabled programs, other than the one we try to avoid calling USS! > > From a GCC perspective, one would normally expect to produce programs that > operate with GNU's library. > > But...that's the nice thing about standards: there are so many to choose from! > > -- > > Regards, Gord Tomlin > Action Software International > (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) > Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 > > > On 2012-06-20 13:04, McKown, John wrote: >> I have downloaded and looked at that. But it does not appear, to me, to be >> very "standard". It doesn't create LE enabled programs (including DLLs). I >> don't see how to use it when compiling via a makefile or when using a z/OS >> UNIX shell. Perhaps I need to double check my first impression. >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
