Shmuel ! A previous reply also suggested "SCAN OFF". I tried it, just tried it again, and it makes no difference. Please look at the example I sent before and try it yourself.
From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 07/19/2012 05:26 AM Subject: Re: REXX ISPF edit FIND failing Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> In <ofc169f9df.8de870ec-on88257a3f.006f4f36-88257a3f.00705...@ea.epson.com>, on 07/18/2012 at 01:26 PM, John Mattson <[email protected]> said: >Thanks to all, I now have something that works, sort of, but there >is really something wrong with ISPF here. Not from what you have written. Try what Tom suggested[1] and add SCAN OFF to your macro. [1] Don't bother with the SCAN ON unless you need it later in the macro. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
