The only address space that is slow coming down is ZFS....it's pretty sloooow
Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jul 22, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > Gil, > > I am with you and zMan what's so difficult about an orderly shutdown on OMVS > and z/os address spaces..z/Pdt has vtamappl, everything shutdown fine... > > Scott ford > www.identityforge.com > > On Jul 22, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:23:36 -0400, zMan wrote: >>> >>>> Some years ago, I suggested in MVS-OE that MVS shutdown should >>>> send SIGTERM to all dubbed processes so that processes coded to >>>> UNIX conventions could perform orderly shutdown. The suggestion >>>> was not well received. >>> >>> Can you elaborate? Why would orderly shutdown not be A Good Thing? >>> >> "They" didn't say. Too UNIXy for them. But I'll conjecture: Many address >> spaces get dubbed nowadays by incidental use of UNIX services such as >> TCP/IP. The default action for SIGTERM if a process doesn't handle it >> is that the process is terminated. This would be unwelcomed by a process >> that was waiting rather for a legacy MODIFY command to shut itself down. >> >> -- gil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
