In <[email protected]>, on 07/31/2012 at 12:59 PM, David Crayford <[email protected]> said:
>On 31/07/2012 12:09 PM, Steve Comstock wrote: >> I never saw an answer from you regarding my question for some examples >> of how other non-primitive OS's provide a "simple way a program can >> protect its storage from meddling by others" >Off the top of my head thread-local-storage >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread-local_storage. That doesn't address the issue of protection. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
