Hi, Sorry for late replay. There is no relative between the systems (CPUs) I mean there is no LPAR definition . The only relative is share DISKs.
The Load and IPL disk are same. The IOCP mostly same, the only deference are channel paths. ________________________________ From: "McKown, John" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 4:59 PM Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. What is the relative "CPU power" between the system which "failed" and the one which worked? I ask because we have a "sandbox" system here which is "hard capped" to 1 MSU on a z9BC. It gets "stuck" in _exactly_ the same place, with no messages, for over 5 minutes when we IPL it. We've learned to just be patient. It's just that the system is doing "something" in the interval which does not produce any messages. We have two other LPARs; one is production; the other is "development". The "development" LPAR is not weighted as high as the production one. It also "pauses" for a short time at this point, whereas the production one does not. ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mehrshad Manshadi [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. from where i must check this state? More information : Whenever we IPL the system from the other CPU with same (parameter,console and same load address) everything is fine and the system work properly. because of that it seems that it is hardware problem somewhere.!!!??? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
