On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:04:10 -0700, Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> wrote:
>I like the advice to bounce LLA. This should eliminate a timing issue. >While LLA is down, the (new) directory will be searched on each fetch. >Once LLA is back up, he will have an updated picture of where members are >located. Why hurt performance for the whole system? Just remove the library from LLA instead prior to the directory expansion if there is a concern about those modules getting accessed at the time. > >It's important to distinguish between an allocation change and a directory >change. FETCH cares a whole lot about PDS extents. Only LLA cares about >directory details. > Agreed. -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
