We are a z/OS 1.13 shop and encountered an S878 as well.  There is an APAR  
OA39358 with fix # UA65499.
I have applied this fix to my system and have not had a re-occurrence.



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ravi Gaur
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DFSMShsm Abend S878

We are having a very busy system as well (for example 15 volume migration 
tasks, 13 recycle tasks, and 10 recall tasks running) hence couple of things 
being discussed are :

Time to run HSM's major functions(recycle/migration etc) to ensure you have 
them spread out as much as possible.

consider using the Mutiple Address Space HSM (MASH) function. Using MASH, you 
can run multiple instances of HSM on an LPAR and assign some of the workload to 
the additional HSM(s).  

Use DSS cross-memory mode for HSM procsessing. This will move much of the 
storage requirements of DSS to cross-memory address spaces and get them out of 
the HSM user region.

(FYI Above DSS Cross memory is a  new function drived from zOS1.9 onward more 
to address 878-
10 issue and going to run new address space for most of the HSM function except 
Recall and indeed need a kind of whole new setup and to address/implement it a 
complete new project needed.) 

Region size increase (check with IEFUTL exit) and also any above the line 
storage definition in STC Proc of dfhsm.


FYI - There's some orphaned tape MVT allocations. These are control blocks that 
were allocated by HSM for tape processing but do not get  freed when the task 
finished with the tape and being addressed with APAR OA40365.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to