Mea maxima culpa. I don't know what I was thinking about when I typed that, but obviously it was the wrong thing.
Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: "Dynamic DCB" [was "New" way to do UCB lookups] On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:15:12 -0800 Edward Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: :>On 11/19/2012 2:48 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: :>> You do know that the DCBE's can be in 31-bit storage, right? That's the one address in a DCB that is a 31-bit address. And you can share them among DCB's, so you don't have to have a 1-to-1 correspondence between DCB's and DCBE's. :>Really? You can share a DCBE among several DCBs? I'm skeptical. Where is that :>documented? The opposite is documented - open sets DCBEDCB -> DCB. No way to have the DCBE point to multiple DCBs. -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
