In
<cae1xxdfvwjwpqze8jwh1fuqklsob2mddzvu6xz7puva+maf...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/02/2012
at 10:04 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>I concede this, whatever that may mean in this context since I
>also asserted it. What is important about such matched pairs of
>LOADs and DELETEs (or terminations) is that they ensure that a
>single copy of a sharable resource, a table or reentrant
>executable, can in fact be shared among tasks.
No, what is important is that each address space has its own name
space for loaded modules.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
