On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:21:24 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:

>I had that problem in a shop long ago. In defense of the 'perpetrators', if a 
>user got caught by timeout chopper, getting back on could be long and 
>difficult. The real culprit was lousy tuning and inadequate resources. The 
>resource problem eventually got solved by an upgrade. No users were harmed in 
>the process.  
>
At one time our admin installed a timeout chopper for CMS users.
He was generous and naive enough to provide a "two minute warning".
The first time I was away from my desk long enough to miss that
warning I installed a background process to trap the warning.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to