Thank you. Mos of our "fancy" sort stuff is mine, so I can make these changes. But, and this is just asking, not really expecting. For compatibility and migration purposes, is there a way for DFSORT to accept this specification?
I have 4 LPARs. This job runs in 3 of them. 2 still run Syncsort. My migration will take a little more time. I could check and see if Syncsort actually required this specification or if I did it by habit. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On > Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 3:05 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Syncsort to DFSORT - my time has come. > > Dave, > > DFSORT Joinkeys does not require the FORMAT of the key field as a binary > match is done implicitly. > > So change your control cards to the following(Just removed the CH on the > Fields statement) > > JOINKEYS FILE=F1,FIELDS=(1,9,A),TYPE=F > JOINKEYS FILE=F2,FIELDS=(6,9,A), > INCLUDE=(6,9,CH,EQ,C'MCR02143I'),TYPE=V > > > Further if you have any questions please let me know > > > Thanks, > Kolusu > DFSORT Development > IBM Corporation > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
