>>For compatibility and migration purposes, is there a way for DFSORT to
accept this specification?

Unfortunately NO.  The other product had to introduce the formats for
compensating the rich functionality of JNF1CNTL and JNF2CNTL in DFSORT.
DFSORT gives you the entire INREC formatting with JNF1 and JNF2.

>>I could check and see if Syncsort actually required this specification or
if I did it by habit.

If the key formats are of the same format (like in this case both key
fields are character data) , you absolutely don't require the format.
However if your key has ZD and PD combination then you can use JNF1/JNF2 to
normalize one of the key to match the other.

for example as 4 byte Packed decimal field is compared to 9 byte zoned
decimal number

JOINKEYS FILE=F1,FIELDS=(1,4,PD,A)
JOINKEYS FILE=F2,FIELDS=(6,9,ZD,A)

You can change this to

JOINKEYS FILE=F1,FIELDS=(81,9,A)
JOINKEYS FILE=F2,FIELDS=(6,9,A)

//JNF1CNTL  DD *
  INREC OVERLAY=(81:1,4,PD,ZD,LENGTH=9)  $ convert 4 byte PD to 9 byte ZD
format
/*


Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to