On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:49:20 -0600, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:24:40 -0600, Clifford McNeill wrote:
>
>>Are you really copying new to current or this that a typo?
>> Cliff McNeill
>>
>It seems to me to be eminently reasonable to replace the
>stale one ("current") with the fresh one ("new"); certainly
>not vice-versa.
>
Either way makes sense to me depending on what you are doing. Maybe
a rename done afterwards.
Anyway, to add to what was already said about using DISP=OLD,
if you have RMF options set for ENQ(DETAIL), it should show up
in a RMF post processor report. You may also find it in
RMF III.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:[email protected]
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
