Starting one session, and then another, didn't change anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Patrick Loftus
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FTP problem

Good idea.
Try starting one session, and whilst that's still running, does a 2nd start 
just as slow or faster.

------ Original Message ------
From: "kekronbekron" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 19/08/2021 12:21:58
Subject: Re: FTP problem

>Does this happen only on the first time for each ID?
>Wondering if it's OMVS automount related, i.e., it trying to create/auto-mount 
>a zFS for that user.
>
>- KB
>
>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
>On Thursday, August 19th, 2021 at 4:48 PM, Patrick Loftus 
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  So if z/OS FTPing to itself also has same problem, that rules out a 
>> lot
>>
>>  of external network issues I guess. Was your z/OS FTP test to itself
>>
>>  using an interface IP address?
>>
>>  Any different BPXPRMxx settings in play, or any different FTP server
>>
>>  settings, or using exactly same as normal?
>>
>>  How does SSH perform, if you've got that up and running?
>>
>>  Regards
>>
>>  ------ Original Message ------
>>
>>  From: "Gadi Ben-Avi" [email protected]
>>
>>  To: [email protected]
>>
>>  Sent: 19/08/2021 12:05:53
>>
>>  Subject: Re: FTP problem
>>
>>  > Hi Patrick,
>>  >
>>  > We do not have any ftp exits defined.
>>  >
>>  > CPU perfromace is not a problem.
>>  >
>>  > If I do tso ftp from tso I get the same problem.
>>  >
>>  > -----Original Message-----
>>  >
>>  > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [email protected] On 
>> Behalf Of Patrick Loftus  >  > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 1:53 
>> PM  >  > To: [email protected]  >  > Subject: Re: FTP problem  
>> >  > See anything obvious on the syslog?
>>  >
>>  > Which FTP Server exits do you have in play, such as FTCHKPWD ?
>>  >
>>  > How is CPU performance looking?
>>  >
>>  > Can you try TSO FTP from the z/OS system to itself for comparison?
>>  >
>>  > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>> IBM-MAIN  >  > Email secured by Check Point  >  > For IBM-MAIN 
>> subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,  >  > send email 
>> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>
>>  send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>> IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Email secured by Check Point

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to