The editor, etc., would have to include bash support. That's why I wrote "Within the constraints of support".
Are you referring to z/OS 2.5 ISPF Edit and Edit Macros, SC19-3621-50? That seems to have CLIST and REXX examples but not COBOL. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 3:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Top 8 Reasons for using Python instead of REXX for z/OS On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:17:08 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >What interfaces does the client support? I'm pretty sure that, in addition to >what you list, there are people happily using > > * LISP (not me) > * oorexx > * ruby > * scripting language built in to the terminal simulator > * shell of some flavor, e.g., C, korn > Oops! I neglected *sh in my list in an earlier ply. >Within the constraints of support, it's partly a matter of taste. > But how can one interface (e.g.) Bash to an editor, a terminal emulator, or other utility? The ISPF Ref. has (too many?) examples for COBOL, CLIST, ... and too few for REXX ADDRESS ISREDIT. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
