Something like a zPDT or MicroFocus environment then transfer the object code.

https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zdt/10.0.0?topic=overview

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:25 AM kekronbekron
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> What do you mean by, "Possible to run compiler on low cost program then 
> transfer PDSE members."
>
> - KB
>
> ------- Original Message -------
>
> On Tuesday, February 8th, 2022 at 12:29 AM, Mike Schwab 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Varies by processor, specific model, and version of your operating
> >
> > system. Look up the table on
> >
> > https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/lib03060.nsf/pages/lsprindex?OpenDocument
> >
> > Best suggestion is to recompile Cobol programs with 6.2.for faster
> >
> > instructions on newer processors. Much higher compile time but pays
> >
> > in run time. Possible to run compiler on low cost program then
> >
> > transfer PDSE members.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 6:53 PM Farley, Peter x23353
> >
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > My immediate management is asking me how to convert measured user task 
> > > CPU seconds saved in a MIPS reduction project to a MIPS value for 
> > > reporting to executive management. Yes, we do know what MIPS means 
> > > (Meaningless . . . ), but this is what they believe executive management 
> > > wants to hear.
> > >
> > > Is there a reasonably simple formula that can be used? I have a current 
> > > version of IPLINFO available, which reports total MIPS and 
> > > SU's-per-sec-per-CP for a CEC, so if I did the following calculation 
> > > would it at least be close to a reasonably accurate MIPS value (FSVO 
> > > "accurate")?
> > >
> > > MIPS-per-CP = (IPLINFO MIPS per CEC) / general-CPs-online-to-CEC
> > >
> > > Measured-CPU-seconds-saved * MIPS-per-CP = MIPS-saved
> > >
> > > Or would it be more accurate (again, FSVO "accurate") to report SU's 
> > > saved by calculating:
> > >
> > > Measured-CPU-seconds-saved * IPLINFO-SU's-per-sec = SU's-saved
> > >
> > > TIA for any help or advice you can offer.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > > -----
> > >
> > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> > > addressee and may contain information that is privileged and 
> > > confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient 
> > > or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> > > notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly 
> > > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> > > notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
> > > attachments from your system.
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
> >
> > Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to