In <08f601ce2c18$96cba9d0$c462fd70$@mcn.org>, on 03/28/2013 at 05:58 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> said:
>I know I can call from Rexx using "standard" MVS linkage using >ADDRESS LINKMVS or LINKPGM. (We just went over the differences >here; let's not digress into that!) But if I am RTFM correctly, >LINKMVS/PGM requires a separate load module or alias (or IDENTIFY >and I don't think I want to go there for this). It's not my dog. >I don't *think* I can make a standard MVS linkage function part of >a Rexx function package, is that right? LINKMVS/PGM and Rexx >functions live in different worlds, right? LINKMVS/PGM always >searches for MVS entry points, and only Rexx functions use >function packages, is that right? Correct. >Or does anyone know something I am missing? Other than the fact that you'll wind up with duplicate copies of the function and will have the hassle of keeping the C++ and REXX copies in synch with each other. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN