On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:20:10AM +0000, Rupert Reynolds wrote:
> Vaguely related, can anyone comment on the assertions that PL/I was
> considered "too slow" back in the old days, and that it was "too verbose
> for writing system code"? Excuse me? MVS system macros are stuffed with its
> close relative, PL/S!

I used PL/1 back in the MVT days, F level.  My memory says that it
did a getmain/freemain for each PL1 procedure call.  So reading a file
of students (30k+) you couldn't afford a procedure call in the path.
It was ok to use them during init and term (which only happened once).

This was a 360/91KK and 2314 disks...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to