On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 18:02:53 +0400, suresh chacko wrote: >I agreed with Tom. GCP is set run at low speed though Linux can be hosted >natively on it. There may be something went wrong in initial planning of >Memory, storage sizing etc. Otherwise there should not be any high CPU >usage on IFL. > If CPU usage is low on your IFLs, then you're paying for too many IFLs.
Do I understand correctly that license terms do not allow the number of specialty processors to exceed the number of general processors? If so, then which costs less: o Adding one general processor, uncapped, or o Adding one general processor, capped as low as possible, plus one specialty processor? Certainly if the OP has unused general processor resource but is CPU-constrained on IFLs, it makes sense to move Linux workload to the general processors. Can a single LPAR have a mixture of general processors and IFLs? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
