You're right John, my management has already reached that conclusion. -----Original Message----- From: John McKown [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Question concerning Z/VM, Linux and General Processors
Not likely gonna be cheap to run Linux on a CP. The CPs on the machine are likely kneecapped. And using them for Linux will probably drive up MSU costs on non-Linux systems. And you can't have a single Linux system use both an IFL and a kneecapped CP concurrently. So if it is a single Linux instance which is soaking the IFL, the only choice reasonable is another IFL. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Joel C. Ewing <[email protected]> wrote: > Or the transaction rate or application complexity has simply grown > from the original design and has finally exceeded their IFL engine(s) > capacity and they are now trying to determine the cheapest alternative > for increasing the CPU power available to z/VM and Linux. > JC Ewing > > On 04/04/2013 09:17 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote: > >> Thank You Suresh, >> >> Improper sizing of Memory, Paging and SRN parameters is a definite >> possibility. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: suresh chacko [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:03 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Question concerning Z/VM, Linux and General Processors >> >> I agreed with Tom. GCP is set run at low speed though Linux can be >> hosted natively on it. There may be something went wrong in initial >> planning of Memory, storage sizing etc. Otherwise there should not be >> any high CPU usage on IFL. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Tom Marchant >> <[email protected]>** >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:38:41 +0000, O'Brien, David W. wrote: >>> >>> Can a workload such as Linux which is currently running on an IFL, >>>> run on >>>> >>> a General Processor? >>> >>> Yes, it can. Remember that IFL processors run at maximum speed, >>> while general processors may have been set to run at a slower speed, >>> depending on the model. >>> >>> We seem to be experiencing high CPU usage and management seems to >>>> feel >>>> >>> switching the >>> >>>> workload off of the IFL might be beneficial. >>>> >>> High CPU usage in the IFL? >>> >>> -- >>> Tom Marchant >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> ---------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> >> >> -- >> *SureshNc* >> >> >> >> > > -- > Joel C. Ewing, Bentonville, AR [email protected] > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**------ > ---- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
