> On Apr 22, 2022, at 3:42 AM, David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> If you already deliver container images that support your product that >> currently run outside z/OS, or if that’s what you plan to do, it’d be a >> great idea to add s390x compatibility to your container images so your >> customers have greater deployment flexibility. That’s usually quite easy to >> do. > > Good advice. I would also add that if you are a vendor planning to deliver > zCX container images then make sure you add other compatibilities just in > case your customers don't run zCX. It could be a POC obstacle.
Building the s390x containers is straight forward. It’s the POC challenge. It’s like showing up with SAE tools to work on a car that is metric. Not going to be very useful. Matt Hogstrom [email protected] +1-919-656-0564 PGP Key: 0x90ECB270 Facebook <https://facebook.com/matt.hogstrom> LinkedIn <https://linkedin/in/mhogstrom> Twitter <https://twitter.com/hogstrom> “It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive." — Hogstrom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
