On Wed, 4 May 2022 14:41:17 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
> ...
>That APAR really shouldn't be suggesting ISFMIGRL when it appears not to be
>a thing, of course.
>
Yes.
>If this were CMS, you could issue:
>address command 'SUBCOM SDSF'
>to test whether the SDSF subcommand environment was available (RC=0, yes;
>RC=1, no). Too bad a generic equivalent didn't get carried into Rexx in
>z/OS.
>
Yes. I've similarly wished for:
SUBCOM ISREDIT (I know an alternative.)
SUBCOM ISPEXEC (I know no alternative.)
--
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
