I have a single name with multiple options that might fit it and I look for
the best fit.

*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **|  *

*|* *Email**: [email protected] **|* *Mob**: +972 522 986404 **|*
*Skype**: ItschakMugzach **|* *Web**: www.Securiteam.co.il  **|*





On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 4:13 PM Paul Gilmartin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:45:50 +0300, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
> >I think this issue was discussed here in the past, but I can't find it.
> >Anyway, I am trying to figure out what is a better fit for a generic mask.
> >Assume I have SYS1.PARMLIB.OLD and I am looking into two strings:
> >SYS1.PARM** and SYS1.PARM*.OLD
> >Is there a way to identify which is better covers SYS1.PARMLIB.OLD (the
> >second one, of course)( using Rexx?
> >
> Do you need to enumerate the generic or have you a list?
>
> Do you wish to compare pairwise:
>     SYS1.PARM01 and SYS1.PARM01.OLD
>     SYS1.PARM02 and SYS1.PARM*02.OLD
> etc.?
>
> Rexx has no compare intrinsic.  Can you address LINKMVS IISRSUPC?
> <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=search-examples>
>
> --
> gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to