MQ from IBM developed about 20+ years ago helped get from Batch to real
time.   You put messages to a queue, and it can run IMS transactions
(including OTMA),  CICS transactions, or even batch!.  You can put on one
member in a sysplex and get in another member.
It has single put, and also publish/subscribe capability.

Colin

On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 at 22:27, Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote:

> "What have transactional systems like CICS or IMS got to do with
> real-time, straight-through processing? Most mainframe transactions
> store data that is later processed by batch, typically overnight."
>
> If you think CICS and IMS are transactional only, youre stuck in the '80s.
> As an example, ICCF on VSE uses CICS as the TP Monitor. Tell me that
> writing code, storing it in a library, compiling, etc. are not "real-time".
>
> Joe
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 1:03 PM David Crayford <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 20/06/2022 12:38 am, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> > > Keep in mind that the mainframe can only do batch processing, with
> input
> > from cards. It doesn't support anything like CICS, IMS or Sabre..
> >
> > What have transactional systems like CICS or IMS got to do with
> > real-time, straight-through processing? Most mainframe transactions
> > store data that is later processed by batch, typically overnight. In the
> > case of banking transactions that require inter-bank settlements this
> > can cause delays of several days. In Australia the government mandated
> > the NPP (New Payments Platform) which facilities instant payments using
> > payids, which can be an email address, cellphone numbers etc. The API is
> > a simple REST API using HTTP
> >
> >
> https://nppa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NPP-API-Framework-v4.0-Final.pdf
> .
> >
> > It's my understanding that no bank implemented NPP on the mainframe.
> >  From the presentations I've seen they used CDC to capture writes and
> > then published events to Kafka, which was fanned out to different
> > micro-services to do fraud detection, payments, push notifications etc.
> > Back in the day straight-through processing was a pipe dream which is
> > why we have overnight batch. It's a relic of applications written
> > decades ago for very different hardware platforms.
> >
> >
> > > It's much better to run Linux than to get an IFL, which can only run
> > batch.
> >
> > I have no idea what you mean?
> >
> > >
> > > Cynical? Moi?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on
> > behalf of David Crayford [[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2022 2:36 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Modernize Mainframe Applications for Hybrid Cloud with IBM
> > and AWS
> > >
> > > On 19/06/2022 5:23 am, Enzo D'Amato wrote:
> > >> I also agree, but as a non-insider, I wanted to know what others were
> > thinking. I also belive that in most cases, the effort spent trying to
> get
> > off the mainframe would be better spent actually fixing the code running
> on
> > it in the first place. Moving around broken code doesn't automatically
> fix
> > it.
> > > It's not just about fixing broken code. If you read the ING CIO's
> > > remarks about why they wanted off the mainframe it's not about the
> > > platform. Nobody denies that mainframes are insanely brilliant hardware
> > > platforms. ING wanted to get rid of batch and move towards an event
> > > driven architecture using pub/sub where they can easily deploy loosely
> > > coupled micro-services to provide cutting edge products. The technology
> > > stacks are built on open source such as Kafka, MongoDB, Cassandra,
> NiFi,
> > > Avro etc.  The retail banking industry has been disrupted by fintechs
> so
> > > waiting for an overnight batch schedule for settlements is a
> competitive
> > > disadvantage.  Cracking open and modernizing 50-60 year old COBOL batch
> > > applications is a VERY heavy lift.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1GoiNO6FBPSWW0D9FZYVYixer1jsPeSd_xH-wmi6jMOC-onAkZQ4Pkf3c1UMGWbQeEprnkSWa1xGxz4vvn-LF0jVrCFlVVFZKQJ4Jti8nbQ7QchsOxhwNiwluJrdKkQP2nXXHQH2Ut2NNa9VChfVBIDR7Akw4ud6_pIXLAFXO5l73Sv-iLZFNU1MWWnLapWhhCKvytdzs7EJTvNZ2qbU8xwCdBEl1UkUuL-jHHZLk6xJPxAadVRWP1nuLz8i5AZrfvDI8u8rZ0V0DT77_Uvu8klHLbL9xe2qaYi1P6a6mc8r9Aj2jothGC-CR9cbCgb-JVXupgin9UctH5C_iVMyn_T-9jzZjtNyZDETxb8hXMU-BOuUz89MGu1nniZJ2tvSSN8yh5A6K-_It8fA10UFCfSBhOB0NVkwKL5M8A2BxZ9_e111GnxGK_PAbj0wh5fvU/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theregister.com%2F2016%2F07%2F01%2Fing_mainframe_strategy%2F
> > <- read
> > > the comments section. It's hilarious :)
> > >
> > > The doubly whammy is there's a skills crisis slowly unraveling. In the
> > > last year we've had 3 key resources move to 3 day weeks with a view to
> > > retiring. Replacing highly skilled assembler programmers with deep
> > > subsystem knowledge is proving to be difficult. Young people don't want
> > > to learn HLASM as they consider it a dead-end. Their position is "why
> > > invest 3-4 years learning a language that is useless if you move to
> > > another industry?" I can't comment about COBOL application developers.
> > >
> > > In 10 years time I expect the mainframe to be alive and kicking and
> > > significantly modernized. The small/medium shops will probably be all
> > > gone. When I first moved to my current town in 1998 there were 25-30
> > > mainframe sites. Now there are 3 and 1 is on life support. One of our
> > > customers re-platformed their CICS/COBOL/Batch applications from a z9
> to
> > > a single blade server. It doesn't make any sense financially for a
> small
> > > site to run a mainframe.
> > >
> >
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-2iTgedz9DPApFopeywjfCeLAkb4kS8D5gFCEDU1FxvGiDWA4ou6pqJyb1d_hBAvGUBtcA89RrAylX3opaG2YEyDaGkIhptpRdukdHvdGOJNKn5bruFlKlnigitV6PrV4n-6zInQkhkJJdSriM40VeYiNOpB8Pg3nTa5E6k6TTIOXSfdaiQOGk1Y6EXL4Xtu-wkeXJmwaPEZljVo3KuwR0K75lrsX8fDe2f2CjcjvfrM3ruLG4na4zrAU_pR4DViMh7bKBhJ35a94VHU7GR4Vh_mXKaYwtbhwnRJWR8gVkvYjmB2CjTOIxJE52bNN1-82_fpYopX-kZQntDkR4OKjvj-b1AV9yXlGQ3A-eGFbtuCb0_1t2R9tgZ5MqgMbzxGQKIf78I2U_xq8a9qYywx3_OgfQwbeMgd8fiatdC5CbUSlphDlQfSDw9sOErejC7z/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.itnews.com.au%2Fnews%2Fwa-insurance-commission-decommissions-mainframe-322780
> > >
> > >> Get BlueMail for Android<
> >
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1bcgENTOsK8XbQ24q-R3ISXJI_yYDqxq2wHDg7brpU3Np08gk-JU47Zv8dYAGOAWnxVTv-NWRXAx9s4JTmUJU07wHFT67zaiAPG32upxzSYnSiKIM6O3YI79ZGti7V-QdCWRtiBxOjLh3oMxNvzCcJgTTW-HQmmeQii1zDdP-GC1Rs0umn7xhevV0-PazdAun8gOm5P8Ld_gCw2UojSyXNKZKfmsqJPnt96XgISsJy9-_K81O2L5O-GDW2nxM7_C00lPjk0sF0iNqPQKNZAhVr0kk4TCoT4ePDBbBBUCUw6KfhxpkkhmUuo549OfnVRHweKCGYhEm5WE9nw-5khsn01oqKJxbv_y6P4BrO5DGw0QG7NfYwbUflAaNRV_ljL51KqrNoQV0AdEetiWauYmab1O_GjVvCOudxDs52JwrFXbWBbqEqxhU7qQ3TS--F13f/https%3A%2F%2Fbluemail.me
> > >
> > >> On Jun 18, 2022, at 5:13 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]<mailto:
> > [email protected]>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I always like the stories about the companies that are in the eighth
> > year of
> > >> a three-year project to get off the mainframe.
> > >>
> > >> Enzo, my friend, you have just kicked the hornets' nest! You had
> better
> > >> duck, because the onslaught is coming. "The mainframe is [not] dead"
> is
> > near
> > >> and dear to the hearts of IBM-MAINers.
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I think the consensus is that the mainframe has a future. IBM
> > seems to
> > >> be focused mainly on the very largest shops, so the trend seems to be
> > bigger
> > >> and bigger machines at fewer and fewer companies. But it is hard to
> > envision
> > >> Bank of America balancing their checking accounts every day on an
> array
> > of
> > >> Windows servers, in their datacenter or in the cloud. My reading of
> the
> > tea
> > >> leaves -- I am not an insider -- is that for a long time IBM was
> > *saying*
> > >> the mainframe was here to stay but internally they did not believe it
> > and
> > >> were not making decisions on that basis -- but I think that has now
> > changed.
> > >> IBM appears to have made a HUGE investment in the z16, an investment
> > that
> > >> will take more than 5 or more years to recoup.
> > >>
> > >> Welcome aboard!
> > >>
> > >> Charles
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On
> > >> Behalf Of Enzo D'Amato
> > >> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2022 1:56 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: Modernize Mainframe Applications for Hybrid Cloud with
> IBM
> > and
> > >> AWS
> > >>
> > >> As someone who is new to this field, and hasn't been though a wave of
> > "the
> > >> mainframe is going away" yet, will there still be companies running
> the
> > >> mainframe 5 or 10 years down the line? Also, when I read about
> companies
> > >> trying to get off of the mainframe, how often do these efforts end up
> > >> succeeding?
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on
> > behalf of
> > >> Mike Schwab <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2022 12:04 AM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: Modernize Mainframe Applications for Hybrid Cloud with
> IBM
> > and
> > >> AWS
> > >>
> > >> Moshix signed up for an AWS instance, loaded up Hercules and Turnkey
> > >> 4-, got it going, and allowed some other people to log in.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Bill Johnson
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>    Cloud - Something the mainframe has been doing for decades. We
> > called it
> > >> outsourcing. GM ran their entire organization out of mainframes in
> > >> Charlotte, Dallas, & perhaps another in the 80's. The internet just
> > made it
> > >> easier, and less secure & reliable. Brought outsourcing to a wider
> > audience.
> > >>
> > >>    Mainframe modernization. An oxymoron. Like saying today's cars are
> > like
> > >> cars from 50 years ago. The mainframe is more advanced than any other
> > >> platforms. Billions of dollars of investment and patented technologies
> > have
> > >> guaranteed its place for decades to come.
> > >>
> > >>    Sure, AWS, Azure, Oracle cloud & numerous others are creating
> cheap,
> > >> unsecured, unreliable, platforms for small businesses, picture
> storage,
> > >> emails, instant messaging, and many other tasks that aren't show
> > stoppers if
> > >> they're hacked or down for one of many reasons. As Capital One found
> > out and
> > >> lost almost 200 million for the pleasure.
> > >>
> > >>    I enjoy the glee that many of you exude when IBM has what might be
> > >> perceived as negative news. I saw the same glee when in the 90's some
> > idiot
> > >> said the mainframe would be history circa 2000.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    On Friday, June 17, 2022, 9:06 AM, zMan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>    On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 5:50 AM David Crayford <
> [email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>    Maybe it's the case that customers don't want to use IBMs cloud.
> > Where I
> > >>    live in Australia the big four banks are moving significant chunks
> of
> > >>    their infrastructure to public cloud and have government
> legislation
> > to
> > >>    do so. NAB in particular have been quite aggressive, although like
> > most
> > >>    sensible enterprises they have gone down the multi-cloud route with
> > >>    Microsoft Azure so they don't have all their eggs in one basket.
> > >>
> > >>    It will be interesting to see if IBM can close the cloud gap.
> Playing
> > >>    catch-up is difficult when competing with behemoths with a decade+
> > head
> > >>    start.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    Indeed. Word from insiders is that since IBM "management" have
> > decided
> > >>    cloud is The Answer, folks have started playing games, like
> > attributing
> > >> all
> > >>    CICS-related revenue as "cloud". Q4 2020, IBM claimed $6.2B in
> cloud
> > >>    revenue on total revenue of $16B. Given that nobody EVER
> says"cloud"
> > and
> > >>    "IBM" in the same sentence in the real world, those numbers are
> quite
> > >>    difficult to believe without this kind of gameplaying.
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >>    For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >>    send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> > IBM-MAIN
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >>    For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >>    send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> > IBM-MAIN
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
> > >> Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >>
> > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > >>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to